"Grotesque"
William Saletan says that from a pro-life viewpoint, this story is "grotesque" and from a "pro-choice" viewpoint it is "agonizing."
The story involves a couple in Japan who underwent in vitro fertilization only to be told that it was possible that the baby growing inside the woman (about 8 weeks along) was not theirs. The couple aborted. The other couple who were the possible biological parents of the child had also been undergoing in vitro. The woman was older (40) and she wasn't told that her baby was possibly aborted until two and a half months later.
Obviously, for pro-lifers, a baby lost his or her life and the families involved will always be haunted by this horrific sequence of events.
Now, my question for the pro-abortion side would be why would this be an "agonizing" situation for pro-abortionists? If a fetus is just a "blob of tissue" or the "products of conception" then this should be a non-issue or at most a dispute over property rights. Is it "agonizing" because it points out all the errors in judgment and the fallacies that pro-abortion groups use in justifying abortion? Or is it agonizing because the reality is that a fetus is more than a "blob of tissue"?
The truth is our gut instinct is to recognize that there is more here than just malpractice issues or property rights.


